Goyette & Associates has reached a settlement agreement with the California Department of Human Resources (CalHR) on behalf of an employee who filed a claim alleging that CalHR wrongfully collected salary earned and collection of an alleged overpayment was unlawfully delayed.
In a typical voluntary transfer from one classification to another, a state employee must complete a probationary period. During that time, an employee may be rejected from the transfer, and returned to his or her prior classification. If the rejection was improper, an employee can appeal, and if successful, he or she will be reinstated. Finally, the state is directed by the Government Code to reimburse that employee salary he or she should have earned, but for the improper rejection.
However, as alleged in the Petition filed by Goyette & Associates attorney Sarah Chesteen, the California Department of Human Resource actually collected from the Petitioner salary he legitimately earned during an improper rejection. In the unusual situation, Petitioner’s transfer was to a lower paying position. CalHR actually collected the surplus salary earned by Petitioner during the improper rejection, claiming that it was “as if” Petitioner had been working the lower paying position the entire time. The Petition argued that CalHR’s collection of salary earned was not authorized in these circumstances, and violated the duty to pay employees as set forth in the salary schedule, as well as the obligation to provide like-pay for like-work, and was a breach of implied contract.
The Petition further argued that the collection was not only unauthorized, but CalHR made a onetime partial collection, then waited five years before collecting the remaining amount. As collection of any alleged overpayments must be initiated within 3 years after the alleged overpayment, the Petition alleged that CalHR violated its duty to collect within a reasonable time pursuant to its own procedures.
CalHR denied liability and a settlement was reached to compromise the disputed claim whereby the Petitioner agreed to dismiss the claim in exchange for full payment of the amount collected, plus a portion of attorney’s fees.
By Sarah Chesteen
Posted in Civil Litigation: Employee Representation, Firm News, G&A's Newsletter, Labor and Employment Law Affecting Public Employee Associations, Sarah Chesteen, Trial Outcomes in State and Federal Court, Wage and Hour Legal Issues Affecting Employees and Employers
Tagged CalHR, California Public Employees, employee, employee classification, Goyette & Associates, law suit, Settlement
California: Employers may not ask for Facebook, Email, Twitter, Google+, LinkedIn and Pinterest or other Social Media passwords without justification. Almost everyone these days has a Facebook account, or at least an email address. How secure is an employee in … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Litigation: Employee Representation, Sarah Chesteen
Tagged Ask, California, Email, employers, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn, passwords, Pinterest, Social Media, Twitter
California Supreme Court Rules In Brinker Case – Employers Required To Provide Breaks, But Not Required To Ensure No Work Is Done This morning, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in the case Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. … Continue reading
What Do I Do If I’m Not Getting Paid Overtime? (and what does the Employer do if any employee may be owed Overtime Pay) In California, non-exempt hourly employees must be paid overtime for hours worked over a certain limit, … Continue reading
Posted in Gary Goyette, Sarah Chesteen, Wage and Hour Legal Issues Affecting Employees and Employers
Tagged Department of Labor, Department of Labor Standards Enforcement, DLSE, DOL, employee, employer, FLSA, law, lawyer, overtime, overtime claims, paid, pay, wage, wage and hour, wages
The Who-What-Where-When and Why of New Employment Laws Employers and employees have less than one month to become familiar with the requirements and benefits of the new California laws, effective January 1, 2012. We’re here to give you a quick … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Litigation: Employee Representation, Labor and Employment Law Affecting Public Employee Associations, Sarah Chesteen
Tagged AB 1396, AB 22, AB 240, AB 469, attorney, Collection of Damages, Commission Agreements, employee, employer, Employer Credit Checks, Employment, Independent Contractor Misclassification, law, law firm, lawyer, Leaves of Absence for Organ Donation, litigation, minimum wage. violations, SB 272, SB 459