A common error under both federal and California wage law is the misclassification of employees as “exempt” from overtime pay, when such employees are actually non-exempt, hourly employees under the applicable law. Goyette & Associate’s team of wage and hour lawyers are experts in navigating the ‘tests’ to qualify for ‘exempt’ status and how they are defined under both the federal FLSA and under CA wage law.
‘Exempt’ employees must satisfy both a ‘salary test’ and a ‘duties’ test. The salary test requires that exempt employees receive a predetermined amount of pay (for each year or each work/pay period) which is at least twice the amount of pay based on minimum wages and which is not subject to reduction or variation based on the quantity or quality or the work performed.
Exempt’ employees must satisfy both a ‘salary test’ and a ‘duties’ test. The ‘duties’ tests vary somewhat for Executive, Administrative and Professional exemptions, but all require the regular exercise of independent judgment and discretion by the exempt employee (as opposed to non-exempt employees following detailed directions under close supervision or under numerous requirements set by the employer).
Class Action Litigation
G&A’s Gary G. Goyette is a preeminent expert in class action litigation and has represented both plaintiff classes and defended company defendants successfully in state and federal court class action proceedings.
Overtime pay due to misclassification
Misclassification of employees as ‘exempt’ when their pay and duties dictate that they are really non-exempt, hourly employees can result in significant overtime pay owed. Even if the pay provided to such misclassified employees is found to ‘cover’ all the hours worked, a portion of overtime pay for the hours which surpass the applicable overtime pay trigger will be owed, since overtime pay is either time and a half or double time pay.
If you are an employee or an employer with specific questions regarding the classification of employees as exempt versus non-exempt, hourly, contact Goyette & Associates today.
Contact G&A’s team of exempt misclassification experts now to have your legal needs reviewed.
By: Paul Goyette A recent string of California Superior Court and Court of Appeals Decisions indicate a clear trend to decline various employee and employer organization challenges to PEPRA. PEPRA is a form of pension reform law that was passed in 2012 and became effective January 1, 2013. PEPRA made several changes to the California public sector pension systems....
Attorney Brett Sherman of Goyette & Associates successfully represented a State of California Employee in the overturning of a voided appointment. Employee X* was promoted to a Staff Services Manager I (SSM) position within the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation in 2007. Employee X worked in that capacity until 2013, at which time Employee X...
by: Nicole Valentine It would be an understatement to say that 2017 was one of the most rewarding years in my practice as a criminal, labor, and licensing attorney. Below are some of the most notable results I achieved for my clients in each of these areas: One of the most important highlights of this year was when I won a client a full dismissal of all counts of an...
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Request a Free Legal Consultation
Contact Goyette & Associates for a free consultation. We will respond right away and work with your budget.