COVID19 Exemptions and Mandates in the Workplace - Flat Fee Consultations


by | Oct 13, 2011



Toilet Stall California is one of few states that entitle employees with regular rest breaks. Generally, an employer must allow an employee to take a ten minute break every four hours, preferably in the middle of the four hour period. This break must be paid.

But beyond these rest breaks, what can an employer regulate in terms of necessary personal time, such as timing and frequency for calls of nature?

  • Do trips to the bathroom count toward these two paid breaks?
  • What happens if an employee must use the restroom more than two times during the day? What if a sick employee needs to use the restroom for more than ten minutes?
  • What if the employee abuses his or her restroom privileges and leaves the workstation excessively?

Although these may be embarrassing topics, these are real issues that employers and employees face every day.

Though navigating these nuanced laws might seem difficult, we have extensive experience. If you need help with labor relations law, let us help you.

Bathroom Breaks Do Not Count As Part of the Lawfully Mandated Rest Period

A trip to the bathroom will not count against the employee’s paid rest break time. In California, an employee generally enjoys the privilege of using the restroom without the law’s interference.

The California Division of Labor Standard Enforcement’s Policies and Interpretations Manual explains that the mandated rest period should not be confused with use of restroom facilities. If an employer allows an employee to use the restroom, the time an employee spends in the restroom will not be counted as part of a rest period. The rest period must be provided in addition to the amount of time for bathroom use.

For example, if an employee uses 4 minutes to use the restroom, an employee will still be entitled to 2 full 10 minute rest breaks. But even though the law doesn’t regulate bathroom time, that doesn’t mean the employer can’t.

An Employer May Still Reasonably Limit an Employee’s Use of the Restroom

Brief non-working gaps in the workday are considered a privilege, not an entitlement. Therefore, an employer who permits employees to use the restroom without regulation is providing employees with a privilege that the employer rightfully expects should not be abused.

If an employee is habitually using the restroom in excessively, an employer has the right to reasonably limit the amount of time an employee may be absent from his or her work station. There is no bright-line standard for what kinds of limitations are appropriate on use of the workplace restrooms.

At least one company has approached this sensitive subject by establishing the time allowed for bathroom breaks as part of the negotiation process with employees. In its 2005 memorandum of understanding, Ford Motor Company agreed to give employees 48 minutes per shift for bathroom time. Shockingly, Ford issued a memoranda to its employees that year, explaining that managers would begin to keep a close eye on time spent in the bathrooms, because so many employees were using more than their 48 minutes per shift.

The bottom line is: An employer may not impose unreasonable restrictions on employee use of facilities, but may provide sensible limits on use. If an employer places unreasonable restrictions on use, employees may file a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA). Each complaint received by OSHA is looked at on a case-by-case basis, looking to the environment, nature of the restriction, and the employer’s justification. Consideration is also provided to whether the policy is general and whether an employer recognizes employees’ medical needs or reported adverse health effects.

An Employer May Be Required To Reasonably Accommodate an Employee Whose Disability Requires Increased Bathroom Use

If an employee has a disability recognized by law, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act both require employers to reasonably accommodate employees with disabilities. This may include providing the employee with more time to use the toilet facilities.

In the 2009 Marin County case A.M. v. Albertsons, LLC, a checker was suffering from dry mouth, resulting from her cancer treatment. Consequently, she had to keep a water bottle with her at all times and increase her consumption of water. She logically had to make numerous trips to the restroom during her shift, as often as every 45 minutes, and this was accommodated by her regular managers. However, when one manager, unaware of her medical condition, refused to let her leave her station to use the restroom, the employee could no longer hold it and lost control of her bladder in front of customers.

The employer’s failure to provide her in just this one instance with a reasonable accommodation for her disability was found to have violated her rights under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. A jury awarded the Plaintiff a total of $200,000: $12,000 for past lost wages, $40,000 for future medical expenses, and $148,000 for past emotional distress. The plaintiff had lingering psychological effects; she was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder as a direct result of the incident.

Employers must therefore be extremely careful to keep supervisors informed of accommodations made for employees with disabilities. Even one incident of failure to accommodate could result in a devastating experience for an employee, and major ramifications for the employer. As demonstrated by A.M. v. Albertsons, this is especially true in the area of disabilities that deal with bathroom issues.


  1. I’m a flagger working for a construction company. Many time bathrooms are not provided and we have to go wherever, we are only given breaks to run and I mean run to relieve ourselves. I have been told to hurry many times and often have to beg just for this, we pencil in that we take lunches, but are never given a lunch break( with the paving crew), at a company meeting someone ask about the 10 minute break times and was told by company owner that we can not stop work to give breaks but just ask and you will be given one which we all know is a joke. I stand in the street for up to 14 hrs sometimes or more. I am NEVER given time to just sit and get off my feet, and sometimes when I ask to use a bathroom it can easily take over an hr to get someone to relieve me. In 2013 I had a breakdown from working long hrs in every hot conditions Shade in not provided and the other flagger I work with never go’s to the bathroom and just go’s along with the way we are treated so it makes it harder on me. What are my rights I feel I’m about to loose my job to younger girl and have been with this company for 18 yrs.

  2. I had FMLA and ADA accommodations and per my FMLA and Dr.’s note, due to my condition, had to use the restroom more times than alotted in our daily schedules (30 mins/ 2 15 min breaks, not including lunch) The employer determined that the only way to accommodate me was to use my FMLA time for an extra 30 mins a day, broken up into 10 mins every hour. This was necessary because the bathrooms were very far away from my work station and I usually had to fill up my water bottle at this time. In using my FMLA time, I also had to have my pay deducted like I would if I called out for FMLA. So this was 2 1/2 hours every week taken from my paycheck in various forms (vacation time, sick time, personal time, and if none of those were available, I would just have the money deducted). This caused my condition to worsen due to stress, my pain medication had to be upped, I was making less money for the same amount of time worked (outside of the 30 mins a day), and was afraid to utilize my FMLA time due to the fact that I would not be able to afford it. Is this legal in Florida?

  3. Thank you for visiting our site. Please call our office at 888-993-1600 to speak with one of our associates to see if you may have a case.

  4. Thank you for visiting our site. Goyette & Associates is a California based law firm and we do not practice in your state, therefore we are unable to provide you with legal advice regarding your matter.

Comments are closed.

Papers used by a Sacramento Wage Claim Lawyer

Contact Us for a Free Consultation


Recent Post

Managing the Adverse Impact on PEPRA Employees

Mar 7, 2022 | Labor & Employment,

Managing the Adverse Impact on PEPRA Employees The Public Employee Pension Reform Act of 2013 (P...

PORAC LDF Rolls Out Plan VI Coverage Details

Feb 25, 2022 | Labor & Employment,

PORAC LDF Rolls Out Plan VI Coverage Details As you are aware, the passing and subsequent signin...

COVID-19 Supplemental Sick Leave Bill Signed by Governor Newsom

COVID-19 Supplemental Sick Leave Bill Signed by Governor Newsom It’s official, Supplemental Si...

Governor Newsom Extends Supplemental Sick Leave

Governor Newsom Extends Supplemental Sick Leave Governor Newsom announced today that an agreemen...


Contact Goyette, Ruano & Thompson for a free consultation. We will respond right away and work with your budget.