Goyette & Associates Reaches Settlement Agreement with CalHR For Employee Overpayment Collection Claim

by | Jun 19, 2013

Goyette & Associates Reaches Settlement Agreement with CalHR For Employee Overpayment Collection Claim

Goyette & Associates has reached a settlement agreement with the California Department of Human Resources (CalHR) on behalf of an employee who filed a claim alleging that CalHR wrongfully collected salary earned and collection of an alleged overpayment was unlawfully delayed.

In a typical voluntary transfer from one classification to another, a state employee must complete a probationary period. During that time, an employee may be rejected from the transfer, and returned to his or her prior classification. If the rejection was improper, an employee can appeal, and if successful, he or she will be reinstated. Finally, the state is directed by the Government Code to reimburse that employee salary he or she should have earned, but for the improper rejection.

However, as alleged in the Petition filed by Goyette & Associates attorney Sarah Chesteen, the California Department of Human Resource actually collected from the Petitioner salary he legitimately earned during an improper rejection. In the unusual situation, Petitioner’s transfer was to a lower paying position. CalHR actually collected the surplus salary earned by Petitioner during the improper rejection, claiming that it was “as if” Petitioner had been working the lower paying position the entire time. The Petition argued that CalHR’s collection of salary earned was not authorized in these circumstances, and violated the duty to pay employees as set forth in the salary schedule, as well as the obligation to provide like-pay for like-work, and was a breach of implied contract.

The Petition further argued that the collection was not only unauthorized, but CalHR made a onetime partial collection, then waited five years before collecting the remaining amount. As collection of any alleged overpayments must be initiated within 3 years after the alleged overpayment, the Petition alleged that CalHR violated its duty to collect within a reasonable time pursuant to its own procedures.

CalHR denied liability and a settlement was reached to compromise the disputed claim whereby the Petitioner agreed to dismiss the claim in exchange for full payment of the amount collected, plus a portion of attorney’s fees.

By Sarah Chesteen

Papers used by a Sacramento Wage Claim Lawyer

Contact Us for a Free Consultation

916.851.1900

Recent Post

What Does SB 16 Mean For Me?

On September 30, 2021, Governor Newsom officially signed Senate Bill 16 into law. Given the impl...

Got Digital Assets?

Jun 8, 2021 | Estate Planning,

Got Digital Assets? Do I Need to Include my Digital Assets in my Estate Plan? Digital assets are...

Can an employer mandate their employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine?

May 10, 2021 | COVID-19 | Coronavirus,

Can an employer mandate their employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine? As establishments open up ...

REQUEST A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION

Contact Goyette, Ruano & Thompson for a free consultation. We will respond right away and work with your budget.